I'm a Hardcore Capitalist, But Medicare for All Represents the Top Solution for American Healthcare
Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.
Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.
The Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Expensive
Based on a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.
Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.
When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?
How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.
I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.
The Way National Health Insurance Could Function
A national health insurance program would require contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee earning moderate income pays about five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute about 13.75%.
Does this seem expensive? Not if you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I know multiple clients who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When you add those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.
Execution in the US
In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many our government's military, technology, social programs and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.
Advantages for Entrepreneurs
Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render administration much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).
It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and different options.
Free-Market Viewpoint
I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.
Addressing Concerns
Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would still be a better and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.
Time for Honest Assessment
As Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances is that we take a hard look in the mirror and agree that major reforms are necessary.