🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."