🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam decision, the highest judicial body permitted Texas to employ a redrawn congressional map that is projected to include up to five new Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 ruling, released on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to overturn a federal judge's injunction that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Rationale

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing significant confusion and disturbing the sensitive balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its action.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably grouped voters based on their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the new maps. It had mandated the state to employ the maps drawn after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Sharp Opposition

With a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's ruling. She contended that it undermined the work of the lower court, pointing out that its opinion was crafted by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's new map, with all its increased political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a infraction of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

This decision is part of a nationwide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican hold. Typically, redistricting takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of additional conservative seats. The opposition, in response, have pushed back with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State attorney general praised the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes favorable to his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

Conversely, Democratic representatives decried the outcome. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

A senior Democratic figure argued the court had another time eroded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.