🔗 Share this article

The UN Security Council has approved a American-supported resolution that supports Moroccan position regarding the disputed territory, despite fierce resistance from Algeria.

Divided Vote Strengthens Moroccan Stance

While the recent decision was divided, the measure represents the most significant support yet for Morocco's proposal to maintain sovereignty over the region, which also enjoys support from the majority of EU members and a growing number of African partners.

Resolution Structure and Key Elements

The document refers to Morocco's proposal as a basis for talks. Similar to earlier measures, the document makes no mention of a vote on self-determination that includes sovereignty as an option, which constitutes the approach long favored by the independence-seeking Polisario movement and its supporters.

Real self-rule under Morocco's authority could constitute a very practical solution.

Historical Context

The territory is a phosphate-rich stretch of coastline desert the size of Colorado which was under Spain's control until 1975. It is asserted by both the Moroccan government and the Polisario Front, which functions from refugee camps in south-western neighboring Algeria and claims to represent the indigenous people native to the contested territory.

Voting Patterns and Global Responses

The United States, which sponsored the measure, led eleven nations in voting in support, while three nations – Russia, China and Pakistan – abstained. Algeria, the movement's main supporter, did not vote.

The US ambassador, the American ambassador to the UN, stated the decision had been "significant" and would "advance the progress for a long, long overdue peace in the region".

Amar Bendjama, the Algerian ambassador to the United Nations, said that while the resolution was an advancement on previous versions, it "contains a number of deficiencies".

Security Mission and Upcoming Review

The resolution also extends the UN security operation in the territory for another twelve months, as has been implemented for more than thirty years. Prior renewals, though, have not contained a reference to Moroccan and its supporters' preferred resolution.

The measure urges all sides involved to "take this unprecedented chance for a enduring peace." Depending on progress, it requests the secretary general to review the operation's authority within half a year.

Regional Impact and Current Conditions

The change could disrupt a long-stalled situation that for decades has eluded resolution, desdespite a United Nations peacekeeping mission that was designed to be short-term. Demonstrations have followed in Sahrawi settlements in the neighboring country this recent period, where people have vowed not to abandon their struggle for self-determination.

Morocco controls nearly all of the territory, excluding a thin strip known as the "free zone" that lies to the east of a constructed by Morocco barrier.

Historical Background and Current Developments

A 1991 ceasefire was intended to pave the way for a referendum on independence, but disagreements over participation criteria prevented it from occurring.

Through time, the Moroccan government has developed the disputed territory, constructing a deepwater port and a 656-mile road. State subsidies keep basic commodity costs low, and the population has grown significantly as Moroccans establish homes in urban areas such as Dakhla and Laayoune.

Polisario ended the ceasefire in 2020 after clashes near a road Morocco was paving to neighboring Mauritania.

The group has subsequently frequently reported military activity, while Morocco has primarily rejected claims of open conflict. The United Nations describes it "limited tensions".

International Relations and Future Possibilities

Reacting to the draft resolution, Polisario said that it would not join any process aiming "to validate Morocco's illegal military occupation," adding peace "cannot happen by rewarding territorial claims".

The situation represents the central issue in north African international relations. Morocco considers endorsement of its proposal as a standard for how it gauges its allies.

Last October, the UN envoy proposed partitioning Western Sahara, a suggestion no party accepted. He urged the government to clarify what autonomy would involve and cautioned that a absence of development might raise questions about the United Nations' role and "whether there is space and readiness for us to still be useful."

The initiative to reassess the United Nations Mission comes as the US reduces funding for United Nations initiatives and organizations, covering security operations.